With its significantly higher cost, BatchPhoto is the more functional of the two programs we tested. Both support a wide variety of RAW file formats for processing, but you need the Pro edition of BatchPhoto for RAW files and watermarking. Once loaded with a batch of images, either individually or in an existing folder, you can resize, rename, add watermarks, and convert the batch to JPEG, PNG, GIF, BMP, and TIFF output file formats. Photo ©Stan Sholik What’s Newīoth PhotoBulk and BatchPhoto include the same basic functionality. You access the six features in PhotoBulk in one simple interface. The Enterprise edition adds a watched hot folder and a few other capabilities. I tested the Pro edition on Mac and Windows. There are three editions of BatchPhoto: Home for $34.95 Pro for $59.95 and, Enterprise for $149.95. I tested version 2.0 of PhotoBulk for Mac (which is a little more advanced than the Windows version) and available on the app store for $9.99.īatchPhoto includes both Mac and Windows versions, which are comparable. The programs are available for both Mac and Windows computers. But two programs that have come to my attention recently are capable of handling batches of images large and small: PhotoBulk and BatchPhoto. While you can handle all of the above in a number of image editing programs, most of those programs aren’t set up to handle a large batch of images. They may also require a specific naming format for searches, and we may want to add a watermark for identification and protection. Many of these options are online, with each requiring the uploads to be a specific size and file format. As the quantity of images we create increases, so too do the number of options we have to show them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |